Human Rights Watch called on the Iraqi government to suspend its media regulations. The regulations, which impose tight restrictions on the country’s broadcast media, have been enforced by the Communication and Media Commission (CMC) in order to silence the broadcasters who encourage ‘incitement of sectarianism.’ “These restrictions open the door to politically motivated discrimination in the regulation and licensing of broadcasters” claims Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. The organisation claims the government can prohibit speeches and that incite the violence but the vague definition endangers the international norms of freedom of expression. The new restrictive Iraqi broadcast rules have been compared to the Afghan government’s ban on the filming and live broadcasting of militant attacks, approved on March 2010.
NEWS
Iraq government forced to suspend broadcast restrictions
Human Rights Watch called on the Iraqi government to suspend its media regulations. The regulations, which impose tight restrictions on the country’s broadcast media, have been enforced by the Communication and Media Commission (CMC) in order to silence the broadcasters who encourage ‘incitement of sectarianism.’ “These restrictions open the door to politically motivated discrimination in the regulation and […]
By Intern
13 Apr 10
READ MORE
-
Index on Censorship welcomes the release of Palestinian human rights defender and lawyer Diala Ayesh
Ayesh was released from administrative detention on 14 January 2025 by Israeli authorities
-
Saudi Arabia’s hosting of the 2034 World Cup is just another attempt at sportswashing
Undemocratic states that seek to exploit soft power to hide their human rights abuses should be condemned, not celebrated
-
How can Gaza rebuild its culture?
With a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas now imminent, Index reflects on the damage done to Palestine’s cultural institutions
-
What could Assad’s downfall mean for freedom of expression in Syria?
Syrian journalists have been subjected to free speech violations for decades. Could the future hold hope for a more open media landscape?