Index relies entirely on the support of donors and readers to do its work.
Help us keep amplifying censored voices today.
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
As Egypt’s President el-Sisi and President Trump meet in Washington, Index on Censorship and leading international human rights lawyers at Doughty Street Chambers are renewing calls for all charges and sanctions against Amal Fathy, detained for speaking out against sexual harassment in Egypt, to be dropped.
Fathy was arrested in May 2018 after posting a Facebook video about sexual harassment of women in Egypt. Fathy was charged with membership of a terrorist organisation and other related charges. She was released from prison after several months in difficult conditions, but she remains bound by debilitating bail conditions and under constant threat of being summarily returned to prison.
Her husband Mohamed Lotfy and their young son were also held after the night-time raid on their apartment in May 2018 but were released after several hours. Lotfy is co-founder and executive director of the Egyptian Commission for Rights and Freedoms (ECRF), which has played a key role in increasing awareness of enforced disappearances, censorship, torture and violations of freedom of expression and association in Egypt.
Lawyers from Doughty Street Chambers, jointly with ECRF and Index on Censorship, have lodged complaints with the United Nations Special Rapporteurs on freedom of expression and the situation of human rights defenders regarding Fathy’s situation, and in July 2018 they raised Fathy’s case with the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which will begin its next session later this month.
Caoilfhionn Gallagher QC, Doughty Street Chambers, said: “Our client Amal Fathy spent 230 days in prison, in unsafe and unsanitary conditions, separated from her young son and family, simply for speaking out about the rights of women in Egypt. The threat of being returned to prison continues to hang over her. This is the reality of President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi‘s regime. The US has a moral obligation to call on Egypt to quash her conviction and ensure she is truly free.”
Perla Hinojosa, Fellowships & Advocacy Officer at Index on Censorship said: “Index on Censorship urges Egypt to drop all charges against Amal Fathy and compensate her for the months she spent in prison. It must be acceptable to criticise sexual harassment in Egypt and we urge the government to address this important issue.”[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1554819698259-37353be8-3f0f-9″ taxonomies=”25926″][/vc_column][/vc_row]
[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Trinity College, Knights of the Campanile initiation ceremony. Credit: Eleanor O’Mahony, The University Times
UPDATE: Some 74 per cent of students voted against slashing the funding of The University Times at Trinity College, Dublin.
A student newspaper at Ireland’s oldest university, Trinity College, Dublin, could face closure after a forthcoming student referendum due to a row over methods used to investigate a story about initiation into an elitist all-male college society.
The initiation ceremony, or “hazing”, was seemingly meted out to those invited to become members of the Knights of the Campanile, an invitation-only sporting society, based on similar bodies at Oxford and Cambridge universities.
The story was published in The University Times, a student union-funded, though independent newspaper, last month. The story, Knights of the Campanile Hazes Members on Campus, went on to say that reporters from the newspaper had witnessed an initiation ceremony for the elite invitation-only society. It claimed members were taken to the rooms of the society president, while the reporters listened outside and left a recording device outside the door. The reporters heard the potential members being jeered, taunted and told to “bend over”, “get in the shower” to “whisper insults in each others’ ears” and that “HIV is going on your toast tomorrow”.
Groaning, gagging and retching sounds were heard coming from the room. Members were told “it’s gonna be a long night, boys” before being driven away in rental cars.
There was an almost instant condemnation of the methods used rather than the society and the hazing allegation, including from the rival newspaper, Trinity News, which called for the resignation of the editor and said the methods were contrary to journalistic ethics. A petition calling for the newspaper to be defunded, which would almost certainly close it, was also initiated.
However, the story grew. The NUJ’s Ethics Council came out in support The University Times, whose staff are student members of the union, and the International Federation of Journalists described the attempted closure as an attack on press freedom. The university’s School of Law is split, with three professors highlighting the inviolability of the dwelling in the Constitution of Ireland, which the journalists are meant to have breached. Their colleague, professor Eoin O’Dell, defended the newspaper, its reporters and their methods, based on a public interest defence that trumped privacy and was justified by the public interest and the importance of the story. Michael McDowell, Ireland’s former Attorney General and former Minister for Justice, argued at a public meeting at Trinity that the public interest and the guarantees of a free press in the constitution were enough to protect the newspaper and its ethical behaviour.
Another solution, which was not taken up, was that instead of threatening a newspaper with closure, the issue should be taken to the Irish Press Council for adjudication, as both student newspapers are members.
The same newspaper had previously published a story concerning hazing by the college boat club.
The referendum will take place on 10 and 11 April.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1555078636454-225c0bbf-fd09-5″ taxonomies=”8843″][/vc_column][/vc_row]
Joy Hyvarinen, head of advocacy at Index on Censorship, discusses the UK government’s online harms white paper with Jim Gamble, CEO INEQE Safeguarding Group on BBC Radio Foyle’s Breakfast Show.
Hyvarinen said: “If you have a legal duty of care and then combine that with the possibility of very large fines and personal criminal responsibility for senior managers, you get a very strong incentive for online platforms to take the easy way out, and just remove and restrict lots and lots of content. If in doubt, censor — take it down. And that’s going to affect millions of normal internet users. “
The vast majority of senior local news journalists are concerned they do not have the resources to hold power to account in the way they once did, a new survey by the Society of Editors and Index on Censorship has revealed. Read the full article