NEWS

The harassment of Chinese-Australian artist, political cartoonist and activist Badiucao must end
More than 40 organisations from around the world stand in solidarity with the award-winning cartoonist
11 Apr 25

A short video featuring Badiucao championing the right to freedom of expression on a billboard in Mong Kok in March/April 2025. Source: https://x.com/badiucao/

The undersigned organisations condemn the harassment of artist, political cartoonist and activist Badiucao, which has taken place via email, in the media, and on social media in the last week. The harassment began as Badiucao was preparing to publish a statement criticising the human rights situation in Hong Kong. The statement was providing context to his artwork – a short video – that was being exhibited in the city. Like much of Badiucao’s work, the video sought to champion the right to freedom of expression and challenge authoritarianism.

Badiucao was one of more than a dozen artists featured in the three-minute video compilation put together by the Milan-based digital gallery, Art Innovation, on billboards during the Art Basel fair in Hong Kong last week. The 4-second clip, entitled “Here and Now”, showed Badiucao silently mouthing the words “you must take part in revolution” – the title of his newly-published graphic novel and a Mao Zedong quote. It was broadcast hourly between 28 March and 2 April.

On 1 April, Badiucao contacted several media organisations to let them know he would be publishing a statement about the artwork later that evening. Some of them then contacted Art Innovation for comment. Shortly thereafter, Badiucao received an email from the gallery warning him not to publish his statement. They told him that legal action would “definitely” follow if content “against the Chinese government is published”. The gallery later responded to media requests saying that the exhibition “had nothing to do with political messages”.

Badiucao went on to publish his statement. In it, he said: “This art action underscores the absurdity of Hong Kong’s current civil liberties and legal environment. And it would remind everyone that art is dead when it offers no meaning.” The exhibition was removed from the billboards the following morning, despite having been scheduled to be displayed until 3 April.

In a second email to Badiucao, Art Innovation said that his actions had already resulted in financial implications, as well as legal actions, “which will be directed against you”. They demanded that he immediately remove all posts from his personal social media accounts related to the exhibition and claimed that failure to comply could “result in further legal consequences”. They said their lawyers were already working to “initiate appropriate legal action” against him.

On 3 April, Art Innovation publicly accused Badiucao of having provided them with false information and of having violated the contract he signed by submitting political content. “[W]e can consider it a crime,” they wrote on social media. Badiucao said he had submitted the artwork under the pseudonym Andy Chou because the video clip was to be shown in Hong Kong, where the authorities had previously shut down his exhibition. He said he never concealed his identity from the gallery and that they knew that he was behind the artwork.

Art Innovation would also have been aware of the distinctly political nature of Badiucao’s artwork given that they first contacted him via social media, where he regularly shares his artwork with his more than 100k followers, in 2022. They invited him to collaborate on a billboard exhibition during Art Basel in Miami that year, to which he contributed a satirical image of Chinese president Xi Jinping.

“We are appalled at the behaviour of this Italian gallery, which claims to ‘love everything that is outside the rules’ and ‘love the freedom of artists’ and yet harasses and tries to silence an artist that stands for exactly those principles,” the undersigned organisations said. “Badiucao must be applauded for his efforts to creatively challenge censorship and authoritarianism in such a repressive regime. Art Innovation should immediately withdraw their legal threats, issue a public apology to Badiucao, and refrain from further harassment of the artist.”

Signed:

Index on Censorship

Alliance for Citizens Rights

Art for Human Rights

ARTICLE 19

Australian Cartoonists Association

Australia Hong Kong Link

Befria Hongkong

Blueprint for Free speech

Civil Liberties Union for Europe

Cartooning for Peace

Cartoonists Rights Network International

The Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation

DOX Centre for Contemporary Art

European Federation of Journalists

Foundation Atelier for Community Transformation ACT

Freemuse

Freedom Cartoonists

Freiheit für Hongkong

Hong Kong Committee in Norway

Hong Kong Forum, Los Angeles

Hong Kong Watch (HKW)

Hongkongers in Britain (HKB)

Hong Kongers in San Diego

Hong Kongers in San Francisco Bay Area

Human Rights in China (HRIC)

Human Rights Foundation (HRF)

Humanitarian China

IFEX

Lady Liberty Hong Kong

NGO DEI

NY4HK

Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)

Croatian Journalists’ Association (HND)

Trade Union of Croatian Journalists

PEN America

PEN International

Reporters Without Borders (RSF)

Richardson Institute – Lancaster University

The Rights Practice

Safeguard Defenders

StraLi for Strategic Litigation

Stand with Hong Kong EU

Toronto Association for Democracy in China 多倫多支聯會

Uyghur Human Rights Project (UHRP)

Washingtonians Supporting Hong Kong (DC4HK)

Notes:

  • The day after Badiucao published his statement, Hong Kong’s new chief of police warned that, despite Hong Kong’s return to stability following the 2019-20 protests, there continued to be “soft resistance” to the regime through arts and culture. He did not name Badiucao or Art Innovation specifically.
  • On 8 April, the South China Morning Post reported that Hong Kong’s Culture, Sports, and Tourism Bureau had confirmed that they had not requested the removal of the video.
  • The Security Bureau of the Hong Kong government had told South China Morning Post that: “[The] freedom of literary and artistic creation and other cultural activities are protected by law. As long as they do not violate the law, the above-mentioned freedoms will not be restricted.”