Israel bans Sudanese activists from protesting outside the UAE embassy in Tel Aviv

In what critics see as a major blow to freedom of expression, Israel has banned protests against its ally the United Arab Emirates over the latter’s sponsorship of a militia perpetrating atrocities in Sudan.

“This is a very, very grave step that lessens freedom of protest and freedom of speech,” said Oded Feller, director of the legal department at the Association for Civil Rights (ACRI) in Israel.

The ban is causing consternation among the 6,000-strong Sudanese community in Israel. Many of them lost relatives or friends at the hands of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia in their home country.

In a letter from Maya Vinkler, a police legal adviser in Tel Aviv, to Feller dated 20 November and seen by Index on Censorship, Vinkler refers back to a hearing before the High Court of Justice the previous day during which judges deliberated on an ACRI petition on behalf of Sudanese community activist Anwar Suliman. The petition sought to overturn a police decision based on secret evidence that it would be a “severe threat to state security and public well-being” to hold a protest outside the UAE embassy in the Tel Aviv suburb of Herzliya.

“We wanted the Israeli public to know who is responsible for this slaughter and that it is not just the militia,” Suliman said. The UAE has close ties with Israel, establishing diplomatic relations through the US-brokered Abraham Accords in 2020 – and making its first public purchase of Israeli weaponry a year later.

The country is also a major regional player, but after the RSF’s mass killings of civilians in and around the city of El Fasher in Darfur last month its international reputation is declining. Abu Dhabi insists that it does not back the RSF, but the disclaimer is contradicted by “evidence showing the Gulf state has provided munitions, drones and other equipment to the RSF,” according to a 15 November report in the Washington Post.

The deputy head of Israel’s National Security Council and a representative of the foreign ministry attended the high court session.

“In the open part of the discussion it was stressed that there is a danger of harm to state security and harm to foreign relations,” Feller said.

Then the courtroom was cleared so that the deputy head of the National Security Council and “possibly other officials” could brief the judges in secrecy.

When Feller was allowed back into the courtroom, the judges advised him to withdraw the petition. Feller says that since he did not want a negative ruling that would set a precedent, he agreed.

After this setback, Suliman and Feller applied to the police to hold a protest in a park, with placards and speeches, focusing on candle lighting and tributes to friends and relatives killed by the RSF. “I have a friend I studied with for four years and he was killed,” said Suliman “Everyone in the community has someone who was killed there whether it’s a family member or a friend.”

He told Index the Sudanese community just wants to protest the UAE role in Sudan, just as communities in Western cities including London have done recently.

Many in the Sudanese community in Israel have been in Israel for more than 10 years and fled after earlier massacres.  According to Sigal Rozen, public policy coordinator of the Tel Aviv based Hotline for Refugees and Migrants, refugees from the Darfur genocide who had fled to Egypt in 2003 began crossing into Israel because of safety fears after a mass shooting incident by Egyptian security forces outside the offices of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in December 2005. After people saw it was possible to survive in Israel and that they were wanted by the labour market, relatives and friends joined them, she says. This continued until 2012, when Israel erected a fence on the border. According to government figures, 300 people succeeded in crossing into Israel despite the fence during the following three years. The Tel Aviv area has the largest number of Sudanese in Israel. They work mostly in cleaning streets, gardening, and in restaurants and hotels. They do not have work permits, but as part of a 2011 court case, authorities promised they would not enforce the law against them

In previous years, the Sudanese community has been allowed to protest outside the US, UK, EU, Egyptian and Rwandan embassies in Israel. Suliman stresses they were all peaceful demonstrations.

Zakaria Bongo, an English teacher and construction worker from Darfur who has been in Israel for 14 years, is worried that his missing friend Saif Omer may have been killed by the RSF while trying to escape the militia’s capture of El-Fasher. “When the genocide happened last time, people said never again but right now never again is happening in front of the whole world,” he said. “All the world is silent about the crimes so we have to get our voices out.”

But Israel apparently does not want that to happen. The police not only rejected holding the park protest, on 20 November, they informed Feller that they will not grant permits for any protests about the renewed genocide anywhere in Israel. Vinkler claimed in a letter to Feller that during the hearing the judges “accepted the state’s position not to permit protests in the matter of the genocide in Sudan at this time throughout the country.”

Feller says this is a misrepresentation of what happened in the court and amounts to a power grab by the police. He says its decision makers could now, instead of weighing permit applications on their merits “act as the long arm of the national security council and the foreign ministry.”

Vinkler specified in her letter that it did not matter where a demonstration would be held or its “character” it would still be denied a permit. Referring to the closed-door part of the court hearing, Vinkler wrote that the ban against the protest outside the UAE embassy was based on information showing the demonstration “was liable to harm the foreign relations of the state of Israel and state security.”

Alon Liel, former director general of the Israeli foreign ministry, is sharply critical of the police ban. “When you adopt standards of dictatorships and assist dictatorships in committing crimes it shows you might be on the way to losing your democracy,” he said.

The UAE and Israeli foreign ministries did not respond to queries for this article.

 

Algeria’s persecution of poet Mohamed Tadjadit must end

In Algeria a young poet languishes in jail threatened with the death penalty. His name is Mohamed Tadjadit and he was announced on Wednesday as our 2025 Freedom of Expression Arts Award winner.

Tadjadit, 31, was catapulted to prominence during Algeria’s Hirak (which translates in English as movement), the mass uprising that began in 2019 in opposition to Abdelaziz Bouteflika’s bid for a fifth presidential term. At the time Tadjadit was working as a fruit seller in Algiers. Then, as millions peacefully filled the streets demanding democratic change and accountability, Tadjadit stood among them, reciting poetry publicly. He shared his work in darija (Algerian Arabic). His words were raw and rooted in social reality and they became a rallying cry for a people striving for freedom. Tadjadit gained a moniker – the “poet of the Hirak” – and emerged as one of the most recognisable artists of the movement.

But the Hirak didn’t last. While the movement was initially distinguished by both its persistence and its scale, it was paused during the global pandemic and then crushed by the state: Algerian authorities embarked on a coordinated campaign of arrests and repression. And amongst those they turned on was Tadjadit. Between 2019 and 2025, he was imprisoned at least six times. Last January he was sentenced to five years; on appeal, this was reduced to one. Then, on 11 November this year, he received another five-year sentence on a new set of charges. At a trial scheduled for 30 November, he faces an additional charge that carries the death penalty. He’s now on hunger strike.

It’s never easy choosing a winner for any of the Index on Censorship awards – everyone on the shortlist, and the longlist too, has done something astonishing. Read about them here and the report in The Times whose parent company News UK is a sponsor. But Tadjadit’s case is particularly alarming and urgent, and his persecution is far-reaching: millions in Algeria heard his words and were inspired. That’s why the Algerian authorities want him silenced.

Index was created after Stephen Spender, a poet himself, read a plea in The Times from persecuted Soviet intellectuals. Their message was simple: treat our suffering as your own. We answered the call then, and we answer it now. Tadjadit might be thousands of miles away but his plight still matters, and we’ll do everything we can to end this injustice.

Memes: The new frontier of American propaganda

This article first appeared in Volume 54, Issue 3 of our print edition of Index on Censorship, titled Truth, trust and tricksters: Free expression in the age of AI, published on 30 September 2025. Read more about the issue here.

One of the greatest successes of the MAGA movement as they forced their way into the American cultural mainstream was their capture of social media. The world’s richest man Elon Musk purchased Twitter, converted it to X.com and made it a hub for right-wing thought, using his immense reach as the most followed account on the platform to push his own political beliefs to millions. His work earned him a spot at Donald Trump’s side in government (albeit a short-lived one), and he wasn’t the only tech mogul in Trump’s inner circle. At the presidential inauguration on 20 January Musk sat alongside Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg, who lists both Facebook and Instagram in his portfolio, as well as Apple CEO Tim Cook and Google chief Sundar Pichai, all taking positions on Trump’s front row for the event.

It follows, then, that as AI rapidly takes the world by storm, Donald Trump and his team would not wait to use this new technology for political propaganda and the 47th administration of the USA has tapped into a Pandora’s box of AI-generated memes. The New Yorker described the government’s use of AI images and videos as “a form of MAGA agitprop”.

Alex Mahadevan, director of digital media literacy programme MediaWise, told Deutsche Welle: “What AI actually ended up doing was just creating a propaganda machine on steroids… It’s not designed to deceive the viewer; it’s designed to push a political message.”

These examples of AI propaganda start with Donald Trump in opposition campaigning to be president, but continue on official government accounts of the Trump administration.

 

In the early stages of Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump posted this AI smear of her as a communist dictator at a rally in Chicago. The replies to the post were full of more AI generated images by MAGA supporters of Harris in Soviet garb, or interacting with former Soviet dictator Josef Stalin.

Posted by @realDonaldTrump on X

A couple of weeks later, towards the end of August 2024, Trump posted a collection of photos to his social media platform Truth Social of “Swifties for Trump”, the majority of which were AI generated – including this poster. Outrage followed online from Taylor Swift’s fans, as she has previously stated her dislike of the 47th US President. The debacle eventually culminated in Taylor Swift herself announcing her endorsement of Kamala Harris on Instagram.

Posted by @realDonaldTrump on Truth Social

Once Trump was elected, his tendency for smearing political opponents continued at the White House. Democrat Representative. Jimmy Gomez of Los Angeles posted a tweet critical of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids on strawberry fields in Ventura County, California. In July 2025 the official White House X account posted this edit in return, altering his expression using AI to depict him “crying” over the raid. The caption dubbed Gomez “Cryin’ Jimmy” and stated “That ain’t produce, holmes. THAT’S PRODUCT. ” insinuating that the strawberry fields were actually marijuana farms.

Posted by @WhiteHouse on X

Since “Alligator Alcatraz”, an immigration detention facility built on an abandoned Florida airport was first announced, many human rights groups raised concerns about the facility. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a suit claiming detainees there were subject to human rights abuses and denied due process, while the American Immigration Council dubbed the project an “obscene human rights violation”. The response to this criticism was mockery; in June 2025, the official X account for the Department of Homeland Security posted this AI generated image of alligators in ICE caps in front of a cold, hard prison facility, making a joke of the concerns of activists, and playing on the name Alligator Alcatraz – so dubbed because if any inmates escaped, they would be surrounded with the alligator-infested Florida Everglades.

Posted by @DHSgov on X

This AI-generated poster, posted by the White House on X, quotes an interview by JD Vance regarding the mass deportation of supposed illegal immigrants to El Salvador. Many deportations were likely unlawful as they were carried out without due process, giving those deported no chance to plead their case. The poster illustrates how the US Government is attempting to use viral trends to distract from illegal actions. Posted in April 2025 it depicts Vance and Trump as strongmen in the style of Japanese animation film company Studio Ghibli, who released films like Spirited Away and Princess Mononoke. AI images in this style were viral at the time, and the White House wasted no time in co-opting the fad to spread their message.

Posted by @WhiteHouse on X

Posted by the official X account of the US Department of Labor in August 2025, this AI-generated image harks back to mid-20th century agitprop from the likes of Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany. Depicting a strong white male, this image was accompanied with the caption “We need YOU to help unleash the Golden Age of America”, alongside a link to the government’s apprenticeship programme. Deliberately stylised to look aged and slightly tattered, it is evident that the imagery used by last century’s European dictators is being co-opted.

Posted by @USDOL on X

Belarus opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya among winners of Index on Censorship 2025 Freedom of Expression Awards

At a time of rising authoritarianism and populism around the world, crackdowns on protest rights and a stark increase in transnational repression against those forced into exile, Index on Censorship’s Freedom of Expression Awards 2025 honour the individuals and groups who, while often overlooked by the international community, are examples of what the fightback looks like. 

In a ceremony in London, hosts include Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, comedian Rosie Holt, campaigner Bianca Jagger, and playwright David Hare, all there to celebrate four winners for their outstanding and courageous commitment to defending freedom of expression - often an immense personal risk.  

The 2025 Freedom of Expression Awards winners are:

Arts:

  • Mohamed Tadjadit (Algeria) - an activist and poet, currently imprisoned for his work. Nicknamed the Poet of Hirak, Mohamed has been imprisoned six times since 2019 for his poetry and activism, until he was rearrested in January 2025 and sentenced to one year in prison on trumped up terrorism-related charges. This sentence was extended mid-November by another five years, with another hearing scheduled for 30 November.

Campaigning:

  • The Saturday Mothers (Turkey) - the longest peaceful protest movement in Turkish history calls for justice for those forcibly disappeared. Having faced judicial harassment, smear campaigns and police violence for the last three decades, in March 2025, 45 people stood trial for participating in the 2018 vigil, which was subject to a ban by the authorities, and were finally acquitted.

Journalism:

  • Carlos Correa (Venezuela) - a veteran journalist working to protect the broader civic space and challenge the state’s human rights abuses at a time of a severe clampdown on media freedom in Venezuela. This came at a huge risk to himself, after he was abducted and disappeared in January 2025 by state security forces. He was held for over a week, without access to his lawyer or family before being released.  

Trustee award:

  • Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya (Belarus) - Belarus opposition leader who campaigns for democracy and freedom of all political prisoners in Belarus, currently based in exile for her own security. Ahead of the stolen 2020 presidential election, Mrs Tsikhanouskaya stepped in as a presidential candidate after her husband was arrested and imprisoned. She has tirelessly campaigned for the return of Belarusian democracy and advocated for the hundreds of political prisoners held in Lukashenka’s prisons.  

Jemimah Steinfeld, CEO of Index on Censorship, said:

“It was a particularly hard year to judge as the threats to free expression continue to grow, which also means the individuals and organisations willing to confront autocracy are growing too. In these winners we are reminded of extreme courage at a time when all around us darkness seems to be descending. May their stories act as examples for all of us, including those of us in the UK who have fortunately been able to take basic rights largely for granted, but who are now seeing that nothing, not even freedom of expression, is guaranteed. 

We also hope the awards shine light on all too often overlooked areas of the world, including nearby Belarus, and in so doing support both the individuals and their broader causes.”

The winners are announced on 19 November at a ceremony in London. The jury panel for the 2025 awards included Baroness Hollick OBE; Can Dündar, award-winning journalist; Sir Trevor Phillips OBE, chair of Index on Censorship; Ben Preston, Culture, Arts and Books Editor of The Times & Sunday Times; and Jemimah Steinfeld, CEO of Index on Censorship.

The 2025 Freedom of Expression Awards are sponsored by Rosenblatt Law (headline sponsor), Edwardian Hotels (event sponsor), News UK (Journalism), and the Hollick Family Foundation (Campaigning). 

ENDS

Media contact:

Index on Censorship is a non-profit organisation that campaigns for and defends free expression worldwide, including by publishing work by censored writers and artists and monitoring threats to free speech. We lead global advocacy campaigns to protect artistic, academic, media and digital freedom to strengthen the participatory foundations of modern democratic societies. www.indexoncensorship.org 

SUPPORT INDEX'S WORK