Russia: Press freedom violations July 2019

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Index on Censorship’s Monitoring and Advocating for Media Freedom project tracks press freedom violations in five countries: Azerbaijan, Belarus, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine. Learn more.

[/vc_column_text][vc_custom_heading text=”32 Incidents” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

MBH Media journalist charged for cooperation with “undesirable organisation”

30 July 2019  – In Ust-Labinsk, in the Krasnodar region, police searched the house of local journalist Alexandr Savelev and seized his phone, Mediazona reported.

Savelev was taken to the police station for questioning and later released. The next day he was detained and charged with cooperation with undesirable organisation, which is punishable with up to six years in jail.

The police believe that the news outlet MBH-Media that Savelev was reporting for is connected to Open Russia, which is considered an “undesirable organisation” by Russian authorities.

The journalist believes that the criminal case against him is connected to his professional activities, including his investigations into corruption in the region.

Links: https://ovdinfo.org/articles/2019/08/19/zhurnalist-aleksandr-savelev-zanimaetsya-rassledovaniyami-na-nego-vozbudili?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=share&fbclid=IwAR3jdUh5n_SETmBFQlkokQb7qu1Yz0GhfJEPvsJbYJWYqGySrgtu3JnFnEA

https://mbk-news.appspot.com/news/na-zhurnalista-yug/?fbclid=IwAR1b0t7u_KCbkpcLidW6_0LFlh2WzB9ttR_krcjXL28YftutlzPkgCYrjIg

Categories: Criminal Charges/Fines/Sentences

Source(s) of violation: Police/State security

Police detain journalists reporting on Navalny’s alleged poisoning

28 July 2019 – Daniil Sotnikov, reporter with independent broadcaster Dozhd, and photographer Gerogy Markov were detained, despite carrying valid press cards, while reporting on the alleged poisoning of opposition leader Alexey Navalny. Police detained the journalists near the hospital where Navalny was taken. 

Markov said he was also beaten by policemen and his camera was broken. 

Background:

28 July 2019 – Opposition leader Alexey Navalny was allegedly poisoned in jail, where he was under 30 days arrest for organising unsanctioned protests. He was hospitalised on the fourth day of his arrest with symptoms initally described as an “acute allergic reaction.” Later the main immunologist-allergist in Moscow diagnosed him with “contact dermatitis in the facial area and angioedema of the paraorbital area”.

Navalny’s doctor published a post on Facebook criticising the official diagnosis. She said she had attempted to examine Navalny, but was not allowed to. She wrote that, since Navalny does not suffer from any allergies, that he ate the same hospital food as the rest of the patients and did not use any new perfume or hygiene products, this could be “the result of the damaging effects of unspecified chemicals”.

Links:

https://zona.media/news/2019/07/28/razgon?fbclid=IwAR1TP3JwGalq7EMY13aaGsGM9h5Hwr9gvDj139JEXdJ3MIYsjSiU8AiSrYE  

https://t.me/mbkhmedia/11668 

Background links:

https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2431075110337317&id=100003045553668 

https://t.co/rAhclAYeoq 

https://meduza.io/feature/2019/07/28/aleksey-navalnyy-vo-vremya-ocherednogo-aresta-popal-v-bolnitsu-ego-lechaschie-vrachi-somnevayutsya-v-ofitsialnom-diagnoze-chto-proishodit

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation; Physical Assault/Injury

Source of violation: Police/State security

Journalists assaulted while covering mass protests in Moscow

Evgeny Feldman

22 July 2019 – At least six journalists were injured by policemen during a violent crackdown on demonstrators, who took to the streets to protest against the disqualification of independent candidates to the Moscow City Parliament, Meduza reported.

Evgeny Feldman, a photographer who was covering the protests for Meduza. Feldman’s camera was struck by a policeman and his nose was injured in the process. 

Alexandr Soloukhin, a cameraman working with YouTube vlogger Ilya Varlamov, said that he was also hit in the nose when the police surrounded the protesters and started beating them with the batons.

Balaram Usov, editor of student magazine DOXA, was hit in the head with a baton and then his arm was injured when he was pushed and pinched by a door; later he sent to a hospital from a police station. 

Photographer Valery Tenevoy was beaten in a police van, wVD-Info reported. 

RBC journalist Elena Sheveleva reported that she was hit by a policeman and a reporter working for Meduza said that an officer twisted Sheveleva’s arm. 

Links:

https://twitter.com/EvgenyFeldman/status/1155159056908214277

https://twitter.com/varlamov/status/1155150622406168577

https://ovdinfo.org/news/2019/07/27/miting-u-merii-moskvy-27-iyulya-2019-goda-i-ego-posledstviya-onlayn#wtf_1188525

https://ovdinfo.org/articles/2019/07/27/dopuskay-itogi-akcii-storonnikov-kandidatov-v-mosgordumu

Categories: Physical Assault/Injury

Source of violation: Police/State security

Dozhd website suffers DDoS-attack

27 July 2019 – Independent broadcaster Dozhd reported a DDoS attack on its website during live coverage of mass protests against the disqualification of independent candidates to Moscow city parliament.

Links:

https://tvrain.ru/news/sajt_dozhdja_podvergsja_ddos_ataka-490401/

Categories: DDoS/Hacking/Doxing

Source of violation: Unknown 

Police summon TV Dozhd editor-in-chief for questioning

27 July 2019 – Policemen raided a studio belonging to independent broadcaster Dozhd while it was covering mass protests against the disqualification of independent candidates to Moscow city parliament, Meduza reported.

The broadcaster’s editor-in-chief Alexandra Pospelova was summoned for questioning as a witness in a criminal case opend under the article 141 of the Criminal Code of Russia – obstruction of the activity of elections committees. This case had been opened after mass protests in support of the independent candidates to Moscow city parliament, who revealed widespread inconsistency in the election commission’s actions after they were rejected the registration on the grounds of submitting false signatures.

Links:

https://meduza.io/news/2019/07/27/politseyskie-prishli-v-studiyu-dozhdya

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation

Source of violation: Police/State security

Police detain Navalny Live host during live coverage of mass protests

27 July 2019 – Policemen broke into a studio of YouTube channel Navalny Live, run by the team of the opposition leader Alexey Navalny during the live coverage of mass protests against the disqualification of independent candidates to Moscow city parliament – the video of the incident was posted by Ilya Pahomov on  Twitter. Later the host of the channel’s Vladimir Milov reported that he was detained at a police station. 

Links: 

https://twitter.com/ilyapahomov/status/1155098701712494592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1155098701712494592&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmeduza.io%2Fnews%2F2019%2F07%2F27%2Fpolitsiya-vorvalas-v-studiyu-navalnyy-live

https://meduza.io/news/2019/07/27/politsiya-vorvalas-v-studiyu-navalnyy-live

https://twitter.com/v_milov/status/1155104996062629889

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation

Source of violation: Police/State security

Ilya Azar detained in Moscow at mass protest

27 July 2019 – Novaya Gazeta special reporter and a municipal deputy Ilya Azar was detained in Moscow during the mass protests against the disqualification of independent candidates to Moscow city parliament, despite presenting his press-card to the police – which was recorded in the video published by witnesses. 

Links: 

https://meduza.io/news/2019/07/27/zaderzhan-zhurnalist-novoy-gazety-ilya-azar 

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation

Source of violation: Police/State security

Police told journalists to get accreditation to cover mass protests in Moscow

25 July 2019 – The press-service of Ministry of Interior Affairs of Moscow published a statement, asking media managers to send to the police the data of the journalists who would be covering the mass protests against the disqualification of independent candidates to Moscow city parliament on 27 July. 

The director of the Center of Defense of the Rights of Media, Galina Arapova, called it “meddling into professional independence of the editorial offices” and stressed that according to the law, journalists can cover protests and other actions without any coordination with the police. Arapova also warned that submitting such data to the police may threaten the security of the journalists: “We understand, that there were cases when police came to the organisers or alleged participants ahead of the mass actions. Where is the guarantee that they will not come to a journalist ahead of the event, that something won’t happen to him/her and he/she won’t get to the event place? Why does the police need to know the names of those people?” 

The police also asked the journalists to carry with them not only press-cards but a printed editorial assignment from their publication. If they don’t have such assignments, police threatened them with sanctions. Arapova also believes the requirement is illegal: “Detention in this case will be absolutely illegal. According to the Article 47 of the Media Law, journalists have special rights. This is an inalienable professional right. Even without a special assignment. You walked, saw something happening, and started filming. This right is granted to you by the specifics of the professions and the federal law.” 

Links: 

https://77.мвд.рф/news/item/17697354/https://whitenews.press/?p=5798&fbclid=IwAR3CgUp0WfT8DzpEh7wQ96A30onTcZcePuqk5RLu7IqhDP24Zp2Iu8GxKMc

Categories: Intimidation

Source of violation: Police/State security

Administrative case about “participation in the activity of undesirable organisation” opened against the founder of Samara newspaper

26 July 2019 – Yulia Illarianova, director of the founding organisation of Park Gagarina, a local newspaper in Samara, was handed a protocol about the opening an administrative case against her about “participation in the activity of undesirable organisation” because of two news articles mentioning Open Russia (recognised as undesirable organisation in Russia since April 2017) that ran in Park Gagarina. One of the articles appeared in October 2017, the other in January 2019. 

Links: 

https://www.facebook.com/GlasnostDefense/photos/a.849220988467446/2591652674224260/?type=3&theater

Categories: Criminal Charges/Fines/Sentences

Source of violation: Police/State security

Yakutsk journalists fined for article about torture

25 July 2019 – A Yakutsk city court fined Mikhail Romanov, a journalist with local weekly newspaper Yakutsk Vecherny, 30,000 rubles ($473) for “for abusing the freedom of information”, Interfax reported. 

In April, Romanov wrote and published the an artucle with the headline “The victim of the regime” about an employee of a local university who was kidnapped and tortured by Federal Security Service (FSB) officers for leaving critical comments on social media. After the publication, a district police officer came to the editorial office several times to question Romanov, but the journalist refused to testify without official summoning.

Then the policemen opened an administrative case against the journalists under the article 17.7 (insubordination to the legal requirements of a representative of the authorities) and later another one under the article 13.15 (abusing the freedom of information). According to the officer, Romanov’s phrase in the published article “This is a story about the fact that everyone can get into the millstones of the state machine. And about the fact that Big Brother watches, reads all the comments on the forums…” contained hidden inserts, affected people’s subconsciousness and had a harmful effect on them.

Links: 

https://www.interfax.ru/russia/670353

https://www.novayagazeta.ru/news/2019/07/25/153649-v-yakutii-oshtrafovali-zhurnalista-obvinennogo-v-vozdeystvii-na-podsoznanie-lyudey-iz-za-stati-o-pytkah-sotrudnikami-fsb

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4041316

Categories: Criminal Charges/Fines/Sentences

Source of violation: Court/Judicial; Police/State security

Two reporters charged with failure to comply with judge’s orders

24 July 2019 – Reporters of Telegram-channels AvtozakLIVE and Bessrochny Protest were charged with failure to comply with the order of the judge or bailiff to ensure the established order of the courts and pushed out of the court room, where they were covering trial of Alexandr Archagov, charged with organisation of unsanctioned protest against the disqualification of independent candidates to Moscow city parliament, OVD-Info reported. 

Links: 

https://ovdinfo.org/express-news/2019/07/24/na-korrespondentov-dvuh-telegram-kanalov-sostavili-protokoly-za-semku-v-sude?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=share&fbclid=IwAR0xEedt9R61uafD9jGP1WwyXmBH4Vmmce1QppvGuqbQ6E6nSKqhB6o7WDg

Categories: Criminal Charges/Fines/Sentences

Source of violation: Court/Judicial

Grani.ru reporter expelled from court for real time reporting

24 July 2019 – Alim Suleimanov, a reporter with Grani.ru, was expelled from North Caucasus District Military Court for live reporting for Facebook group “Crimean Solidarity” on the trial of Crimean activist Nariman Memedinov, according to journalist Anton Naumlyuk. 

Suleimanov was expelled on the grounds of not getting permission to conduct real time reporting, however such permission is not needed for real time text reporting (only for video). Suleimanov was not charged officially.

Links: 

https://www.facebook.com/anton.naumliuk/posts/2623886230979634

https://zona.media/news/2019/07/24/txt?fbclid=IwAR0hL72rZL0Af5miYT2VPtiufgkZrmBZVQsqexKD1EKE9DdXRnNinoUKgX8

Categories: Blocked Access

Source of violation: Court/Judicial

Dagestan-based journalist charged with financing terrorism

23 July 2019 – Abdulmumin Gadzhiev, a journalist with Dagestan regional newspaper Chernovik, was charged with financing terrorism, according to Pavel Chikov, the head of human rights group Agora. 

According to the offical investigation, Gadzhiev conspired with others, including an exiled Islamic preacher Israil Akhmednabiev to fundraise money for the Islamic state in 2011. Investigators allege that as part of the scheme Gadzhiev published news reports on the charitable activities of Akhmednabiev’s Ansar fund  between 2011 to 2019. The investigators said they believe that Gadzhiev knew that part of the funds was being transferred to the Islamic state in Syria. Authorities believe that over 6 million rubles (almost $95,000) were donated to Ansar by deceived members of the public. 

Gadzhiev was detained on 14 June. The journalist and his colleagues claim that he is innocent. The investigators said that his guilt is confirmed by testimonies of others accused in these case – a lawyer of one of them said that he testified under torture. 

Links: 

https://zona.media/news/2019/07/23/ansar?fbclid=IwAR1nWvGOmAULYtDk2rJIc4o7PpCGSuCGwoU2a7f6zB4daIIDwAhebsNbW-k

https://zona.media/news/2019/06/16/dagestan

https://www.kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/337733/?fbclid=IwAR1DLcgWr39E2hQvMmdysnacAvlO8Tl22XBfGARjBAZonEUiAXo7BpderJo#.XSdd1r18lDU.facebook

Categories: Criminal Charges/Fines/Sentences

Source of violation: Court/Judicial; Police/State security

The court blocks Snob’s test about corruption

19 July 2019 – The Kirovsky district court of Tomsk ruled the Russian state media regulator, Roskomnadzor, could block access to a “test” about corruption, published by Snob magazine in November 2017. 

The lawsuit against Snob was filed in May 2019 by a city prosecutor of Asinovsk, who demanded to block access to the test — “How to give and take bribes properly. Test-instruction for a beginner official” — because “committing actions posted on the website are punishable with criminal and administrative responsibility, and the distribution [of such information] violates … the constitutional rights of an indefinite number of persons to freely seek, receive, transmit, produce and disseminate information in any legal way guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation”.

Snob argued that all the questions in the test are based on real corruption cases, and the test was published as a response to the news that the state budget lost 19 billion of rubles ($300 millions) due to the corruption. 

Links: 

https://snob.ru/selected/entry/130778/

https://snob.ru/news/180189/

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4034634?fbclid=IwAR1Ea5mnFMxEZ13O1hMNuGXwdEWCtbRvi975aVCAP7Ml_6ezw2F_4TQzs9E

Category: Censorship

Source of violation: Court/Judicial

Court bars journalists from covering public trial

18 July 2019 – In Tyumen, Justice of the Peace Natalya Buslovich barred journalists from covering the open trial of Timur Muratov, an alleged son of the former head of the police in Kalininsky city district, who is accused of murder threats, Znak.com reported.

Muratov’s lawyer filed a motion with the court to bar journalists, which was supported by the prosecutor in the case. Despite the objection from the victim’s lawyer, that the trial was open, the justice of the peace asked attending journalists to leave the court room and said prohibited press outlets from publishing about the trial before the final hearing.  

Links: 

https://www.znak.com/2019-07-18/v_tyumeni_sudya_zapretila_smi_osvechat_otkrytyy_process_nad_synom_eks_policeyskogo?fbclid=IwAR3U7qLg2L28MFcpes7Zz4Yjlkib_nToCKIt8QwSTo3BLrlpLg7suM9eyQw

Categories: Blocked Access

Source of violation: Court/Judicial

SotaVision journalist assaulted and detained by police during protest in front of Reutov court

17 July 2019 – Oleg Elanchik, reporter with online-broadcaster SotaVision, was detained during a crack down on a demonstration in support of an opposition activist that took place front of Reutov court, OVD-Info reported. 

According to Elanchik, who was accredited to work in the court, he saw about 16 officers of Rapid Response Group of the Bailiff Service of the Moscow Region  disperse about 30-40 people who came to support opposition activist Evgenoy Kurakin, whose case was being heard in the court that day. Elanchik started to film the aggressive tactics of the officers, when three of them attacked him and tried to take away his phone.

According to the journalist, they “inflicted weak blows, applied a suffocating technique, twisted arms, stepped on the foot”, then dragged him to a police station and drew up a protocol against him about “disobeying a bailiff’s legal order”. Elanchik said that he saw another journalist with “a press-card hanging on his neck” among other detainees. 

Elanchik said he received minor injures and has filed a report with the police: “I have abrasions, bruises, scratches. I went to the emergency room, I have a certificate”.

Links:

https://ovdinfo.org/stories/2019/07/17/kak-specnaz-razgonyal-lyudey-v-reutovskom-sude-rasskaz-zaderzhannogo-zhurnalista?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=share&fbclid=IwAR2Wh_2TNEh_yGrELIvRdb8zWcUMRdX_OinYMgLijf-5ZwApGx-bJFw50QE

https://mbk-news.appspot.com/news/v-reutovskom-sude/?fbclid=IwAR08kJ7hJPI_-TfJneYJ107P_LKRHdo8A5XSCWBcaUVdtZv6ifOqDTS-bnA

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation

Source of violation: Court/Judicial

Journalists detained on request from Vilyusk mayor

16 July 2019 – A film crew working for local broadcaster Yakutia 24 was detained by police in Vilyusk while interviewing people on the state of the city’s roads, the broadcaster reported. 

“We were surveying the residents of Vilyuisk about the condition of the roads. A precinct policeman approached us and said that the mayor, Nyurgustan Afanasyev, filed a complaint with police against me and the cameraman, and asked us to go to a police station with him. We agreed and asked about the reason for the detention”, reporter Evgeniy Toytonov said. 

Earlier the same day the journalists visited the mayor Afanasyev to ask about the condition of the roads. “The mayor was not inclined to give us any comments from the very beginning, he prohibited to film him”, Toytonov said. After the journalist asked Afanasyev about the road works, the mayor asked to talk “about something good” instead and then pushed the reporter and the cameraman out of his office and called the police. 

UPDATE:

17 July 2019 – Afansyev said that he called the head of Yakutia 24 and apologised for the incident, explaining that he called the police to ask them to identify the journalists, whose credentials he did not believe to be real. “We worked well with the broadcaster before that incident. I did not think that the journalists were its employees”.

The press-office of Vilyusk police confirmed the mayor’s complaint asked the police to “identify two unknown men who conducted video recording in the city administration without his agreement and despite his refusal to give an interview”.

Alexandr Kalugin, representative of the media holding company that owns Yakutia 24, said that it is clear in the video that the journalists identified themselves. 

Links:

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4033541?fbclid=IwAR0qEWDxHTnf-CcGW1m0xQ7hi8MqYVPed3KLdb7pt_xibdIojE3LVIRD14I

http://yk24.ru/index/proisshestviya/sotrudnikov-telekanala-yakutiya-24-zaderzhala-policziya-za-vopros-o-dorogax-vilyujska?fbclid=IwAR3u0ocGF0kZsDiTw8vXQt0Ggf2fshMyQgHsS5_h0jiL6_QWPH16rM-1fFo

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation

Source of violation: Police/State security; Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Ingush journalist arrested for 2 months on drug charges

16 July 2019 – A court in Magas ordered the arrest of Rashid Maysigov, a journalist with Ingushetia regional media outlet Fortanga,  who was covering mass protests in the republic, his lawyer Magomed Aushev told Kavkaz Uzel. Maysigov faces two months in detention on the drug charges.

Maysigov was detained on 12 July and accused of drug dealing in larged quantities under the article 228, part 2 of the Criminal Code of Russia. After the detention, the journalist filed a complaint saying he had been tortured by policemen. 

Maysigov’s lawyer said that supporters of the journalist were not allowed to attend the hearing, despite the trial being open to public. 

Links: 

https://www.kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/337931/

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation

Source of violation: Police/State security; Court/Judicial

Journalists barred from meeting of independent candidates and elections committee

15 July 2019 – Mikhail Mokrov, the press-officer of the Moscow City Elections Committee, said that the journlaists would be barred from covering a meeting with independent candidates to the Moscow city parliament, who were earlier rejected for registration on the grounds of submitting false signatures in support of their candidacy, Dozhd reported. 

The candidates claim that the Moscow City Elections Committee’s officials purposely disallowed valid signatures to bar independent candidates from running in the election. The conflict resulted in a mass protest in support of the independent candidates.

After the protests, the Moscow City Elections Committee officials invited the candidates to a meeting. One of the candidates, Lyubov Sobol, invited journalists to attend, saying such meeting should be open and public. 

However, the Moscow City Elections Committee said that it doesn’t plan to organise any events “for press”.

Links: 

https://tvrain.ru/news/na_vstrechu_glavy_mosgorizbirkoma_s_nezavisimymi_kandidatami_otkazalis_puskat_zhurnalistov-489575/?fbclid=IwAR2O8gOh676t53WwKw-3CsbaXzhnMUQBtoZu-Pt8wKMx67FoeOHUn7z_aU4

Categories: Blocked Access

Source of violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Dozhd reporter detained at mass protest in Moscow

14 July 2019 – Alexey Korostelev, a reporter with independent broadcaster Dozhd, was detained by police while covering mass protests against the disqualification of independent candidates to the Moscow city parliament.

Dozhd published the video of the incident. Korosteleve identifies as press, but was nevertheless detained. 

Links: 

https://tvrain.ru/teleshow/here_and_now/video_zaderzhanija_korresponenta-489542/?fbclid=IwAR3PszHzloMBRuMTkTE-WyuqkyGKZfFIg98BhnQLr1GdFC2aDtGCZq-dc5o

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation

Source of violation: Police/State security

Roskomnadzor blocks Ingushetia regional media outlet Fortanga

14 July 2019 – Ingushetia regional media outlet Fortanga, which covered mass protests in the republic caused by a border dispute, was blocked by Roskomnadzor, Russia’s state media regulator, journalist Izabella Evloeva told MBH-Media. According to Evloeva, Fortanga had not received any prior notifications from the regulator. 

According to Roskomnadzor’s list of banned websites, the blocking relates to a ruling by the Batay city court from 29 November 2013; however Fortanga was founded only in 2018.

According to MBH-Media, that the court order relates to a post containing extremist content. Fortanga later reported that they found the referenced extremist content in a comment posted to Fortanga’s page on the Vkontakte social network. Fortanga deleted the comment and informed Roskomnadzor about it. The media outlet was unblocked later the same day.

Links: 

https://mbk-news.appspot.com/news/roskomnadz/?fbclid=IwAR2Q1hZJajZ6oOcdtY-topDl09PtvRiX3k3mnFFbOWx_nCOVg-8JJBtQyGQ

https://t.me/fortangaorg/4040

Categories: Legal Measures

Source of the violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Perm regional authorities proposed reform that would increase their influence on local media

11 July 2019 – Perm regional authorities proposed a reform that would consolidate the region’s media and broadcasters under a registered non-governmental organisation, Kommersant reported.

The authorities say that it would increase the funding for the regional media. Critics argue that it would monopolise the press market in the aread and would deprive private newspapers of state support, automatically redirecting state contracts to the newly formed regional outlets.

Links:

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4026763?fbclid=IwAR343pzgxsUuTYeFftNghPHG5IOMZ5nkOXxSrLkJ-dJQy2MQTO3LGQOVoAk

Categories: Legal Measures

Source of violation:  Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Journalist beaten in a fake queue to election commission in St Petersburg

9 July 2019 – Journalist Alexey Radkov was assaulted by members of fake queue at the election commission in Sergyevskoe district. The individuals wanted to prevent independent candidates from registering for municipal election, OVD-Info reported.

Radkov started filming the line when one of the men punched the journalist. Radkov punched him in return, and then all members of the queue – around 15 men – started beating him. The journalist managed to escape and called the police.

According to Radkov, one of the attackers was from Chechnya, two from Dagestan – they did not have St Petersburg registration and could not be in the queue to register as municipal candidates. 

Links: 

https://ovdinfo.org/express-news/2019/07/09/v-peterburge-uchastniki-feykovoy-ocheredi-v-izbiratelnuyu-komissiyu-napali?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=share&fbclid=IwAR060tIJ68dIOHXKSc71RIF6m1F2xfhFP8PppRUoxRwNWk82FnIYNDt3zNk

Categories: Physical Assault/Injury

Source of violation: Unknown; Known private individual(s)

Three MBH-Media journalists detained near Putin’s residence

8 July 2019 – Anastasia Kulagina, Mariya Pogrebnyak and Andrey Zolotov, journalists with MBH-Media, were detained near the residence of President Vladimir Putin in Moscow region, while they were trying to film video for a report about a dilapidated wooden house next to the president’s residence, MBH-Media reported. 

Policemen explained that the reason for the detention was that the journalists walked into the zone marked with stop sign, which prohibits vehicler access. The police confiscated the journalists’ passports and took them to a police station. Later the journalists were questioned by the Federal Protection Service because they “were at the protected area of the first person”.

Links: 

https://mbk-news.appspot.com/news/zhurnalistov-mbx-media/?fbclid=IwAR2enYnebjBetl6pr7iOVlRyIrelyu8_1tn3qkrDIll8prIPBhKasQOBc3I

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation; Blocked Access

Source of violation: Police/State security

Journalist detained while filming mass detention in Khokhlovskaya Square

7 July 2019 – Maxim Kondratyev, a reporter of Telegram-channel AvtozakLIVE, was detained in Moscow while filming a police raid at Yama, a public space in Khokhlovskaya Square.

The journalist was filming, but did not have a press card with him when he was detained. A policeman who interfered with him did not have a badge with a name. Kondratyev also said that he was kicked by a policeman and pushed against the police van. The journalist was taken to a police station and released after two hours with an administrative charge of jaywalking.

Links: 

https://ovdinfo.org/express-news/2019/07/05/v-moskve-v-yame-zaderzhali-zhurnalista-snimal-reyd-lva-protiv?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=share&fbclid=IwAR2D3JxnFfOBG6mK_gZRrhejhOXDW2H644lYtHlxoq6FMB-xPXIPW07azAA 

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation

Source of violation: Police/State security

Journalists assaulted outside treason trial

5 July 2019 – Journalists who were covering the treason trial of Alexander Vorobyov, an assistant to the Plenipotentiary of the President in the Urals Federal District, were assaulted by an unknown man, who was pushing the journalists in attempt to prevent them from filming the defendant, MBH-Media reported. 

MBH-Media reporter Anastasia Olshanskaya was pushed so hard, she fell to the ground. According to Olshanskaya, the assaulter had a holster, presumably with a pistol. He refused to identify himself or answer any questions in the presence of TV reporters with video cameras, but later said “You all understand, whose trial you come to cover, right?”

Links: 

https://mbk-news.appspot.com/news/v-moskve-posle/?fbclid=IwAR3Nr-OQ6STylQbGS5FmolThdO3sXjf91piygqr0CQRH1gt_zxEEjjV-jSg

https://twitter.com/AsyaOlshanskaya?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1147138801581662208&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmbk-news.appspot.com%2Fnews%2Fv-moskve-posle%2F

Categories: Physical Assault/Injury

Source of violation: Unknown

Koza.press editor-in-chief fined for mentions of ‘undesirable organization’

5 July 2019 – In Nizhny Novgorod,  Justice of the Peace Evgeny Zadkov imposed a fine of 5,000 rubles ($78) on Irina Murakhteva (Slavina), the editor-in-chief of the local media outlet Koza.press, for “participation in the activity of an undesirable organisation”, OVD-Info reported. 

The case against the journalist was opened after a report to the police from an anonymous citizen, worried that the press coverage of forum Svobodnye Ludi (Free People) is a danger to the constitutional rights of Russian citizens. The materials of the case included the screenshots of Murakhtaeva’s reposts of other media materials, including about the arrest of Anastasia Shevchenko, an activist of Open Russia that was recognised as an undesirable organisation in Russia since April 2017.

Links: 

https://ovdinfo.org/express-news/2019/07/05/glavnogo-redaktora-nizhegorodskoy-gazety-oshtrafovali-za-posty-o?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=share&fbclid=IwAR0zgNPyXYPjIuvWB_LesfjNYGu9YJKAP2q7wg6csuJrXO9MLziVYhw1yzY

Categories: Criminal Charges/Fines/Sentences

Source of violation: Court/Judicial; Police/State security

Pskov journalist included in extremists and terrorists list

4 July 2019 – Pskov journalist Svetlana Prokopieva, a reporter with Radio Svoboda and former editor of local news outlet Pskovskaya Gubernia,  was included in the Rosfinmonitoring list of extremists and terrorists, her bank accounts were blocked, Prokopieva said in a Facebook post. She suggested that it means that she would soon be charged with “justification of terrorism”.

A criminal case on “justification of terrorism” was opened against Prokopieva in February after a radio programme at Ekho Moskv on which she commented on a suicide bomb attack of 17-year old student in front of the local headquarters of Federal Security Service.  

Links:

https://zona.media/news/2019/07/04/prokopieva-spisok?fbclid=IwAR2qSZd-y1iKwHowA-qmQS2V2pQzJP_yjrOX-zqUAG_zePSbLjkPUqC34g8

http://www.fedsfm.ru/documents/terrorists-catalog-portal-add

https://www.facebook.com/svetlana.prokopyeva.9/posts/2362072540497708

Categories: Legal Measures

Source of violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Masked men attempt to access Ekho Severa editorial office

3 July 2019 – A group of 11 masked men in sportswear came to a business center, where the editorial office of Ekho Severa, local media outlet in Arkhangelsk, is located, 29.ru reported. The group attempted to gain access to the floor containing only the Ekho Severa offices, which were empty at the time. 

Editor-in-chief Iliya Azovsky said that the goal of the intruders was intimidation of the journalists: “The editorial team has reasons to believe that this incident could be tied to some authors’ journalistic investigations. Almost everyday different so-called fixers come to us with requests, sometimes even with absurd ones at the first glance – to remove an article published a month ago or a new one. And I have to explain them how the internet works, that it is almost impossible to delete the information from it”.

The police launched an investigation of the incident.

Links: 

https://29.ru/text/gorod/66149389/?fbclid=IwAR0chNHrDztkUvZ9HCG-vK4vpGCQxTdT7DMJuWHNIW2daPtgSp1YDl-qR8g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvkqPZBGhPc

Categories: Intimidation

Source of violation: Unknown

Communal service company files a defamation case against Newsvo in Vologda

2 July 2019 – In Vologda, 14 employees of Magistral, a communal service company, including its director, filed a complaint with police against Newsvo, a local media outlet. The complainants accused the outlet of defamation for a post published in the blog section of the site’s website, Newsvo reported. 

On 2 July two policemen visited the Newsvo office to question journalists about how social media posts are transferred to the website’s blog section. The post in question titled “Road works at the embankment started again?” was published on the website on 18 June. It contained a phrase saying that instead of cutting off the illegal grillage (the concrete pavement above the project), some “khanuriki” made a wooden formwork for stones and concrete on it. Magistral employees said in the believe that the word “khanuriki” is defamatory. 

Links: 

https://newsvo.ru/news/121130?fbclid=IwAR2P5fPskD3Jw7yi6lVrrft2VlXRaxoc_uJz8IL6CE4efdHEb-Tifuk_uq4

Categories: Subpoena / Court Order/ Lawsuits

Source of violation: Corporation/Company

NGO files defamation lawsuit against local newspaper

3 July 2019 – Non-governmental organisation Deti Voiny (Children of War) filed a 500,000 ruble ($7,892) defamation lawsuit against local newspaper Narodnaya Gazeta Severskogo Raiona, The Center for Protection of Media Rights reported. 

The artcile in question was published in April and ran under the headline “Non-Childish Problems of ‘Children of War’ in The Region”. The article criticised the latest report on the organization’s activity. The organisation said in its suit that the article contained five defamatory phrase.

A lawyer of the Center for Protection of Media Rights says that all of them are either corroborated by evidence or phrased as an opinion.

Links: 

https://mmdc.ru/news-div/judge_history/v-krasnodarskom-krae-predsedatel-obshchestva-deti-voyny-trebuet-500-tys-rubley-s-glavnogo-redaktora-/?fbclid=IwAR35I1Rv_NeqCcMVlyA2a9AH1vpsRl4EWlVd6w-HCS3rIPCz3FP1IduekHA

Categories: Subpoena / Court Order/ Lawsuits

Source of violation: Corporation/Company

Homophobic group threatens journalists reporting on LGBT rights

2 July 2019 – Pila, a radical homophobic group, published an announcement that declared of the beginning of a new hunting season on LGBT-activists and journalists reporting on LGBT rights. The announcement included the editorial tearms of Novaya Gazeta and the Russian service of Radio Svoboda. Pila said the group had “prepared dangerous and cruel gifts” for those on the list, which was accompanied by images of a noose and a man with a speech bubble saying “maybe I should kill myself”.

UPDATE:

21 July 2019 – Elena Grigorieva, LGBT-activist mentioned on Pila’s list, was brutally killed in St.Petersburg. 

Links:

https://parniplus.com/news/pila-ugrozhaet/?fbclid=IwAR1TQQAFW-KBdTC4ORKraL366kMDQlhjrUrYY0mco56xq49EAtjY3g_835c

https://takiedela.ru/news/2019/07/24/pila-lgbt/

Categories: Intimidation

Source of violation: Unknown; Criminal organisation[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1567419957765-fe9e2033-c002-3″ taxonomies=”8996″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Belarus: Press freedom violations July 2019

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Index on Censorship’s Monitoring and Advocating for Media Freedom project tracks press freedom violations in five countries: Azerbaijan, Belarus, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine. Learn more.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_custom_heading text=”2 Incidents” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][vc_column_text]

Ministry spokeswoman obscenely answers journalist’s request for comment

Zmitser Pankavets

15 July 2019 – The independent newspaper Nasha Niva appealed to Zinaida Biareshchanka, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Agriculture, to comment on the fact that Deputy Minister of Agriculture Ihar Brylo posted a picture on Instagram in which he posed in a t-shirt that read “Russia” while at the Barysau enterprise Zdravushka. The media drew attention to this case and the official closed his account.

In the first conversation with journalist Zmitser Pankavets, Biareshchanka promised to talk to Ihar Brylo, and during the second conversation her mood changed significantly. She refused in an obscene form to answer the questions saying: “Look, stop politicising where it is not necessary to do it. Stop putting in the heads of society that should not be put in.”

The next day, the spokesperson apologised to the journalist for her ‘emotionality’ through Facebook.

Link: https://nn.by/?c=ar&i=233808&lang=ru

https://nn.by/?c=ar&i=233843&lang=ru

Categories: Blocked Access, Offline Defamation/Discredit/Harassment/Verbal Abuse

Source of violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Belsat TV crew detained

9 July 2019 – The police detained Belsat TV journalist Ihar Kuley and camerapersons Syarhei Kavaliou and Maksim Harchanok who were filming an episode of the program Belsat Near You in the local market of the Brest region town of Hantsavichy. The police officers told them to go to the police station claiming that they were not allowed to film and forced them to turn off their cameras. After the police investigated, the journalists were released. 

Link: https://belsat.eu/en/news/belsat-near-you-crew-detained-in-hantsavichy/

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation, Blocked Access

Source of violation: Police/State Agency[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1565080886221-bb53e335-85ed-6″ taxonomies=”8996″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Banned Books Week: A short history of comic book censorship in America

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”108364″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]Nothing defined 20th-century American culture quite like the comic book. Comics in their popular, serialised form emerged in 1930s New York City, mass-produced by recent immigrants and their children who had grown up reading one-strip funny cartoons. The early success of Superman (the concoction of two young Jewish immigrants, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster) spurred the rapid growth of the comics industry. By the mid-1940s, many small-time comic publishers were churning out hundreds of series and characters of all genres.

Soon after comics’ meteoric rise in popularity, the industry drew criticism. Comics were never regarded as “high art” despite the aspirations of many who worked in the industry. They were unapologetically for children and adolescents, produced as entertainment for the lower classes. Many of the comics genres that rose to extreme popularity in the 1930s, 40s and 50s revolved around crime, ghosts and ghouls, aliens, and pulpy romance. Notably, EC Comics started by Bill Gaines was famous for Crime Does Not Pay, a comic that published macabre tales that blurred the line between good and evil. Gaines inherited the publishing business from his father, who had died suddenly in a boating accident, and EC comics became synonymous with the seediest corners of the comics industry.

Because of the gore and sexual content of early comics, the parents of devoted teenage comics readers began to worry about the effect of the comic book on children. The Catholic Church at the time allowed local dioceses to impose bans on certain books, which they quickly levied against most comic books, placing them on lists of books thought to be unsuitable for good Catholic youth. Concerned parents around the country wrote op-eds in local newspapers about the dangers of comics. Parent-teacher associations organised comic book burnings, though Nazi book burnings were still fresh in national memory. Students themselves occasionally spearheaded book burnings and comic purges from school libraries, encouraging friends to bring their collections to fuel the bonfire.

The final straw in the early 1950s was in the form of a book called Seduction of the Innocent, by psychologist Frederic Wertham. Wertham’s book contained no scientific research and was based solely on anecdotal interactions between the psychologist and patients at his clinic. It was unapologetically political and linked the rise of the comic book industry to rises in youth crime (which did not, statistically, exist). The central argument of his book was that the cartoon violence on the pages of comics spurred youth to commit more crimes and that banning comics would drastically decrease rates of youth criminality. Seduction of the Innocent spurred a series of Senate hearings on whether the government should take action against comics. Led by famous Senator Estes Kefauver, the hearings were televised for the comics-hating public to see. This was not the first time government action against comics had been considered: at that point, several bills had been introduced in different state legislatures to enact government censorship on the distribution of comics, though most had been shot down on First Amendment grounds.

The Senate hearings terrified the entire comics industry. Bill Gaines, high on stimulants, testified at the hearings. In a riveting cross-examination by Senator Kefauver, Gaines was backed into a corner, forced to defend a recent Crime Does Not Pay cover (which depicted a hand holding a severed woman’s head) as “good taste.” The Senate hearings led only to a harsh denouncement of comic books and endorsement of Wertham’s pseudoscientific theories about their link to youth crime. The government took no official action to censor comics, though it did encourage the industry to censor itself, which the industry gladly did.

Gaines had, years earlier, formed the Association of Comics Magazine Publishers (ACMP). In an effort to resist government censorship, Gaines rallied ACMP again, though fellow publishers thought it safer to develop intra-industry codes rather than to allow the government to officially censor comics. Fearful that government censorship was worse, the latent ACMP morphed into the Comics Magazine Association of America (CMAA). The CMAA then created the Comics Code Authority (CCA), which developed extremely strict guidelines for comics publishing–no weapons, good must always triumph over evil, women must be conservatively dressed. Since the CMAA controlled the means of production of comic books, without CCA approval no comics could go to the presses.

Full-time CCA censors would comb through every comic issue, circling any potential violations. The publishers who had previously specialised in crime comics, romances, science fiction and fantasy couldn’t get anything published — essentially, only superheroes remained. Comics became sanitised, and many smaller publishers closed down, with comics creators leaving the industry in droves. Bill Gaines’s EC Comics was finally shuttered when CCA censors objected to Gaines sympathetically portraying a black man in a comic.

The CCA’s regulations slowly loosened over time, yet the CCA remained essential in the industry for decades. Without the now-notorious CCA seal of approval on the cover, no comic would be sold. As independently publishing became easier and comics publishers consolidated, there became an independent financial motive for publishing and selling comics from many publishers regardless of their adherence to CCA standards. CCA standards also became looser, as artists infused already-popular series with themes that would have been previously unacceptable–for example, comic giant Jack Kirby famously included a storyline about drug addiction in a popular superhero series. In the 2000s, large publishers stopped seeking CCA approval, starting with Marvel Comics in 2001. By 2011, DC and Archie comics stopped seeking CCA approval for their comics, rendering the agency finally defunct.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Banned Books Week / 22-28 Sept 2019″ use_theme_fonts=”yes” link=”url:https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bannedbooksweek.org.uk%2F|||”][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/4″][vc_single_image image=”103109″ img_size=”full” onclick=”custom_link” link=”https://www.bannedbooksweek.org.uk/”][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”3/4″][vc_column_text]

Banned Books Week UK is a nationwide campaign for radical readers and rebellious readers of all ages celebrate the freedom to read. Between 22 – 28 September 2019, bookshops, libraries, schools, literary festivals and publishers will be hosting events and making noise about some of the most sordid, subversive, sensational and taboo-busting books around.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Reescribiendo el Futuro

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

“No podemos combatir la propaganda con censura”

El Gobierno yemení no debería dedicarse a valorar la objetividad del periodismo, pero hay esperanza de conseguir más libertad, según Ahlam Mohsen

Yemen ha acabado —una vez más— al final de la lista del Índice de Libertad de Prensa de este año; concretamente, en el puesto 167 de 180 países. El mundo periodístico yemení está plagado de contradicciones. Tal vez la censura sea menos directa bajo el Gobierno de coalición, pero recientemente ha habido una oleada de ataques contra periodistas y críticos.

Llegué a Yemen —el país en el que nací pero que apenas conocía— desde EE.UU. poco después de que el presidente del país, Alí Abdalá Salé, renunciara a su cargo a principios de 2012. En Estados Unidos yo era activista y no entendía cómo allí no podíamos aguantar ni ocupando un parque, mientras en Yemen derrocaban a un gobierno entero.

Tras la primavera árabe de 2011, los periodistas yemeníes alcanzaron unas cuantas victorias, como la aprobación de la Ley de Acceso a la Información, que insufló nuevas esperanzas en la transparencia de las instituciones gubernamentales. Yemen es el único país árabe, aparte de Jordania, que ha aprobado una ley así. Sin embargo, como ocurrió con el florecimiento fugaz de la libertad de prensa tras la unificación de 1990, los triunfos no siempre son permanentes, ni el progreso necesariamente lineal.

Desde hace ya cuatro meses, el periódico para el que trabajo, el Yemen Times, ha intentado acceder a los contratos petroleros del Gobierno con corporaciones extranjeras y multinacionales. Podríamos intentar la vía de buscar documentos filtrados, pero es importante que nos lleguen directamente del Gobierno para enterarnos de todas las condiciones, aparte de para que sus futuras decisiones sean totalmente transparentes.

A medida que crecen en número los periódicos, emisoras y canales de televisión afiliados a —y financiados por— diversos partidos políticos y personas influyentes, se ha extendido la preocupación por el uso de dichos medios de comunicación para difundir propaganda. El pasado junio el Gobierno cerró el canal de televisión Yemen Today, tras acusarlo de incitar a la hostilidad contra los actuales gobernantes durante la crisis de combustible por la que pasaba el país.

Muchos individuos habitualmente críticos con la censura del Gobierno guardaron silencio en esta ocasión y evitaron condenar la decisión porque el canal pertenecía al antiguo dictador del país. Pero la medida es preocupante. Al permitir que sea el Gobierno quien juzgue qué es un periodismo “objetivo” y qué no lo es, estamos cediendo un poder que debería concernir exclusivamente a la gente. No podemos combatir la propaganda con censura. El Gobierno debe no solo acabar con ella, sino también procesar a quienes acosan y atacan a los periodistas, y evitar así que estos sientan la tentación de autocensurarse: un problema más grave en este país, con diferencia, que la censura directa.

Ser periodista y mujer también conlleva sus problemas. He visto a chicas salir corriendo para cubrir una explosión o un asesinato, conscientes de que, aunque tal vez sean las primeras en llegar al lugar, acabarán rodeadas de soldados preocupados por su presencia y su seguridad mientras ven cómo sus colegas masculinos se les adelantan. El problema está muy arraigado y va ligado de forma más general al futuro de las mujeres. Pero hay mucho por lo que mantener la esperanza, ahora que Yemen se acerca al cupo del 30% de representación femenina en el Gobierno y las mujeres continúan haciendo patente su derecho a ocupar la esfera pública.

Nada es seguro en Yemen a día de hoy. La historia podría desarrollarse de muchas maneras, desde una victoriosa transición a una democracia hasta una posible guerra civil. Aun así, pese a todos los retos y riesgos que supone ser reportero en Yemen, soy optimista con respecto al futuro. La Ley de Libertad de Información es una ley radical que, de acatarse, nos garantizará el derecho a enterarnos de casi todo lo que hace nuestro Gobierno. Si podemos darle significado a esta ley a base de usarla, en lugar de pensar que son simples palabras sobre un papel, los periodistas —y la gente en general— tenemos mucho por lo que mirar al futuro con ilusión.

 

Ahlam Mohsen es un escritor yemení-estadounidense de 26 años. Vive en Saná y es redactor jefe adjunto del Yemen Times.

ARRIBA: Presentadores de Yemen FM, una emisora privada de radio de Saná, en abril de 2014

Yemen es el único país árabe aparte de Jordania que ha aprobado una ley de acceso a la información

“El periodismo es más emocionante que nunca”

Aunque Katharina Frick ha sido becaria en siete medios alemanes para poder arrancar en su carrera, se muestra optimista ante las nuevas formas de financiación que están surgiendo en el campo del periodismo

En Alemania, como en muchas otras partes del mundo, están cerrando las salas de redacción, los mercados publicitarios están a mínimos y la industria del periódico ha perdido casi un cuarto de su circulación en la última década. Cabría preguntarse por qué sigo queriendo ser periodista. La respuesta: es más emocionante que nunca.

Desciendo de una familia de periodistas. Tanto mi madre como mi padre llevan casi toda la vida trabajado en el campo del periodismo y la comunicación. Muchas cosas han cambiado desde que empezaron a trabajar en la redacción de un diario local hace más de 30 años, y ambos coinciden en que la competitividad es mucho mayor hoy día. A mi madre la contrataron en el acto para su primer trabajo, sin experiencia previa. Hoy algo así se antoja impensable. A lo largo de mis estudios fui becaria en siete sitios diferentes; en algunos me pagaban poco, en otros no me pagaban nada.

La mitad de estas becas y trabajos los conseguí gracias a contactos; la otra mitad, no. Estar bien conectada parece más importante que antes, y es una parte de este campo que he acabado odiando. Siempre he querido lograr las cosas por mí misma, pero he llegado a la conclusión de que no es así como funciona. Al menos, no si lo que quieres es entrar en los grandes medios de comunicación tradicionales.

Por eso cada vez me tienta más centrarme en nuevas formas de informar, más frescas, en las que las ideas y la creatividad se valoren por encima de conocer a este o aquella, como pasa en las start-ups periodísticas. En plena crisis de financiación, las personas con ideas creativas y habilidad para el emprender son, más que nunca, quienes se están llevando el gato al agua. No creo que exista una única solución para asegurar el futuro del periodismo: mi impresión es que hay muchas. Ahora es el momento perfecto para experimentar y probar nuevos modelos de negocio con distintos métodos de financiación e ideas de contenidos.

Son pocos los lectores que están dispuestos a pagar por artículos digitales en Alemania, y solo unas pocas editoriales han tenido el valor de experimentar con modelos de subscripción y barreras de pago. El diario Die Welt, por ejemplo, utiliza una barrera de pago “con fugas” parecida a las del New York Times o el Daily Telegraph, en Reino Unido, en la que se permite a los usuarios leer 20 artículos al mes gratis en un mismo navegador. El Süddeutsche Zeitung, uno de los diarios alemanes de mayor difusión, anunció hace poco que va a implementar un modelo similar a finales de año.

Un proyecto innovador que ha tenido bastante éxito recientemente en Alemania es Krautreporter (o “reportero de masas”). Lo empezaron 28 periodistas independientes, relativamente conocidos, que querían crear una publicación online para artículos de largo formato, sin preocuparse por atraer clics y sin publicidad. Así que le pidieron dinero a la gente. Su objetivo era recaudar 900.000 euros de 15.000 seguidores en un plazo de 30 días. En las últimas horas de su periodo de crowdfunding, justo las personas que hacían falta donaron 60 euros cada una. Al final alcanzaron más de un millón de euros, supuestamente la mayor cifra jamás recaudada en Alemania mediante microfinanciación para un proyecto periodístico. Cada uno de los periodistas ganará de 2.000 a 2.500 euros al mes, cosa que les permitirá dedicarse por completo a su trabajo de investigación sin tener que preocuparse constantemente por cuál será su siguiente encargo.

En lugar de ocultar todos los artículos detrás de una barrera de pago, Krautreporter será accesible para todo el mundo, pero la cuota de 5 euros al mes les dará a los usuarios ciertos privilegios, como poder comentar en los artículos, invitaciones a eventos y la oportunidad de encontrarse con los periodistas. El hecho de conectar e interactuar con los lectores y usuarios de esta manera es algo aún muy nuevo para los medios tradicionales, y muchas publicaciones vigilan con atención este surgir del lector como miembro.

Cómo no, los proyectos nuevos raras veces aparecen sin que les salgan detractores. A los periodistas de Krautreporter les llovieron críticas por la falta de una descripción detallada del proyecto o de un plan de contenidos en sus inicios, y por su elenco de periodistas (al ser hombres en su mayoría y poco diversos). Toda la industria periodística alemana observará la web muy de cerca cuando la lancen en octubre. Las expectativas están muy altas. Aun así, creo que lo que cuenta es esa voluntad de empezar algo nuevo y fresco.

A pesar de la situación de la economía, me niego a creer que el periodismo esté en las últimas o que no vaya a encontrar un trabajo. Depende de nosotros, los periodistas jóvenes, cambiar la situación y experimentar. Sé por proyectos en los que he colaborado durante mis estudios que se respira cierto ambiente al trabajar en una start-up, como esa dinámica de grupo cuando todo el mundo está tirando del carro. Soy optimista y creo que seguiré dedicándome al periodismo en unos años. Nadie sabe qué forma irá tomando, pero no me cabe duda de que será interesante.

Katharina Frick tiene 27 años y está cursando un master en periodismo, medios y globalización, que combina con trabajos independientes para la Agencia Alemana de Prensa (DPA). También lleva su propio proyecto de periodismo y sostenibilidad en www.sustainyourfuture.com

En plena crisis de financiación, las personas con ideas creativas y habilidad para el emprender son quienes se están llevando el gato al agua

Desde Chequia

“Veo un futuro difícil para periodistas y lectores”

Ante el alto nivel de desempleo en su tierra natal, el periodista italiano Luca Rovinalti se mudó a Praga, pero la prensa rosa ha seguido sus pasos

Cuando el decatlonista Roman Šebrle y la modelo Gabriela Kratochvílová se convirtieron hace poco en presentadores del informativo de una de las cadenas privadas de televisión más importantes de Chequia, no me sorprendió. Habiendo dado mis primeros pasos profesionales en Italia, estaba más que acostumbrado a este estilo de prensa amarilla, liderado por famosos. Un estilo que da la impresión de estar en auge por toda Europa.

Cuando trabajaba para los canales principales de televisión privada en Italia, allá por los 2000, el periodismo ya se estaba convirtiendo en un espacio para el cotilleo en el que las noticias estaban pensadas para provocar emociones en la gente. Recuerdo los días que me pasaba en Rímini, a pie de playa, entrevistando a la gente sobre la técnica perfecta para broncearse, o preguntándoles a las chicas cómo se preparaban para la operación bikini.

En 2010 me fui a Chequia para completar un programa de un año en la Universidad Carolina, y decidí quedarme cuando vi todos los puestos de trabajo que estaban recortando en Italia. Tengo raíces polacas, así que me siento bastante cómodo en Europa del Este y voy mejorando con el idioma. Aún trabajo de forma independiente para empresas italianas, pero me interesa trabajar para publicaciones en inglés, tanto aquí como en el extranjero.

De momento he tenido experiencias muy diversas en mi carrera, al haberme mudado de Emilia-Romaña, en el norte de Italia, a Milán, y de allí a la República Checa en 2010, donde ahora dirijo el Club de Prensa Internacional de Praga. Todo ello ha contribuido a formarme una idea de periodismo multicultural, libre de barreras nacionales y respetuoso con las diferencias culturales. Espero de corazón que este concepto crezca a medida que el mundo se vuelve más globalizado, con más publicaciones locales en distintas lenguas y colegas internacionales trabajando codo con codo.

Cofundé el Club de Prensa de Praga en 2013 porque me daba la impresión de que las oportunidades de crear red podían mejorar, y las instituciones existentes no estaban haciendo lo bastante al respecto. Pero no creo que lo que haga falta para ser periodista sea una hoja de papel o un carnet de prensa, como pasa en Italia. Tuve que trabajar durante dos años antes de conseguir hacerme miembro de la asociación italiana de periodistas.

Los niveles de desempleo en Italia —actualmente del 13 por ciento, o del 43 para los menores de 25 años— está teniendo un impacto brutal en el mundo del periodismo. Esto también significa que mucha gente está buscando trabajo en el extranjero. Mario Giordano, redactor jefe de TG4, uno de los programas informativos más importantes de la red italiana Mediaset, me dio este consejo: «El periodismo tiene que cambiar de actitud, no solo de técnicas. Los que saben cómo cambiar son los que están sobreviviendo. Ten en cuenta que los principios básicos del periodismo siguen siendo los mismos, tanto si usas paloma mensajera como tuits».

Estoy totalmente de acuerdo. El periodismo italiano se ha convertido en una carrera de obstáculos que exige a los periodistas estar a la última y adaptarse a las nuevas tecnologías en un mercado en el que casi no hay sitio para el joven talento. Muchos trabajos están externalizándose o se encargan a autónomos a cambio de tarifas miserables.

En mi primer empleo, en la redacción de un canal de televisión, me resistía a cambiar el trabajo periodístico “puro” por uno que incorporase también conocimientos sobre técnicas de grabación, equipo técnico, edición de vídeo y retransmisión. Pero ahora me doy cuenta de que en el mercado actual es crucial ser un hombre orquesta.

En una sociedad en la que los blogueros y reporteros ciudadanos ganan importancia día a día, no tiene sentido ignorar la novedad. Es esencial entender cómo funcionan las nuevas tecnologías y utilizarlas correctamente, con la esperanza de que los lectores sean capaces de distinguir entre verdad y exageración, entre lo que es fiable y lo que no lo es.

Nos bombardean cada vez más con millones de fuentes de información, con noticias reales mezcladas con mentiras, con publicidad camuflada como información veraz y con una filosofía de monetización del clic que hace de las primeras tres palabras de un artículo toda su esencia. El futuro se me antoja un lugar difícil, tanto para los lectores, que tienen que saber distinguir entre lo que es una noticia y lo que no, como para los periodistas, que tienen que hacer malabares frente a la competencia no solo de sus colegas, sino también de los que vienen de otras profesiones, modelos y atletas incluidos.

(C) Luca Rovinalti

www.indexoncensorship.org

Luca Rovinalti tiene 27 años y es un periodista independiente italiano afincado en Praga (Chequia)

[CAPTION] ARRIBA: Unos periodistas trabajan con sus ordenadores durante una conferencia de prensa de Instagram en Nueva York

[PULLOUT] Ahora me doy cuenta de que en el mercado actual es crucial ser un hombre orquesta

Desde Sudáfrica

El periodismo de datos es la última frontera”

Para Athandiwe Saba, el periodismo de investigación tiene un futuro prometedor, siempre y cuando pueda arrebatarles información de interés público a las autoridades gubernamentales

Mi pasión por el periodismo está arraigada en la idea de que todo el mundo tiene derecho a acceder a la información, según expone el artículo 36 de la Constitución sudafricana: «Todo el mundo tiene derecho de acceso a cualquier información en posesión del Estado; así como a toda información que posea otra persona y sea necesaria para el ejercicio y protección de cualquier derecho».

Pero hoy en día, en nuestra joven democracia, los oficiales del Gobierno y la sociedad en general tratan ese derecho con condescendencia, lo menosprecian, le quitan importancia o directamente lo ignoran. En mi trabajo como periodista para el periódico dominical City Press, a menudo me topo con problemas cuando solicito información o comentarios por parte de las autoridades gubernamentales. El problema más reciente lo he tenido con una simple solicitud de los expedientes de todas las escuelas del país incluidas actualmente en el plan escolar de nutrición. Me he visto en la situación de tener que recurrir a citar derechos legales y recordarles a las autoridades que la información es pública. Meses después, aún sigo esperando.

Nuestro Gobierno democrático incluyó la libertad de información en la Constitución como reacción a la censura del apartheid, pero esa libertad sigue estando en peligro constante. El Proyecto de Ley de Protección de la Información del Estado, conocida como “ley del secreto”, es otro tema que lleva desde 2010 en disputa. La idea era regular la información del Estado, contraponiendo sus intereses a la transparencia y la libertad de expresión, pero no hay duda de que habría supuesto restricciones para los periodistas y derivado en sentencias de cárcel para reporteros y chivatos que revelasen información clasificada. El parlamento pasó el proyecto de ley en 2013, pero aún no la ha aprobado.

Mi mayor preocupación con respecto al futuro es el hecho de que, si a los periodistas les está costando tanto obtener información, ¿qué le queda al resto de la ciudadanía? Si las instituciones niegan el acceso a los expedientes escolares, ¿cómo va a poder un padre o una madre pedir esa misma información para defender los derechos de su hijo?

Es preocupante cuando los políticos y las autoridades hacen declaraciones irracionales, como cuando le piden a la gente que boicoteen ciertas publicaciones: el partido en el Gobierno, ANC, y su Liga Juvenil llevan dos años tratando de censurar los periódicos City Press y Mail & Guardian por separado por haber publicado material que consideran ofensivo contra el presidente o el partido. También se le ha oído hablar al director de nuestra difusora estatal sobre la distribución de carnets de periodista y otros métodos de control.

Mi pasión por el periodismo de datos —o periodismo asistido por ordenador— se avivó aún más tras asistir a una conferencia sobre el tema en la ciudad estadounidense de Baltimore. Me ha permitido pensar de forma más crítica sobre las cifras que manejan el Gobierno y las agencias no gubernamentales. La idea aún no ha calado fuerte entre las salas de redacción de Sudáfrica, pues creen que se gasta mucho tiempo en practicar este tipo de periodismo y se han recortado demasiados trabajos. Pero hay un rayo de esperanza. Uno de mis editores lo llamó nuestra “última frontera”, y en el último par de meses he recibido más apoyo en redacción para trabajar en artículos más centrados en datos.

Recuerdo que uno de los facilitadores en la conferencia de EE.UU. me dijo que tenía suerte de ser de un país en el que aún no había despegado el periodismo asistido por ordenador. Aquello me desconcertó. Después me di cuenta de que se refería al hecho de que exista tanta información aún sin explotar, montones de archivos de datos esperando a que aplique las habilidades que he adquirido.

(c) Athandiwe Saba

www.indexoncensorship.org

Athandiwe Saba tiene 26 años y es periodista de investigación y datos para City Press, un periódico dominical sudafricano

[CAPTION] IZQUIERDA: Manifestantes participan en una protesta contra el Proyecto de Ley de Protección de la Información en Ciudad del Cabo, 17 de septiembre de 2011

[PULLOUT] Se incluyó la libertad de información en la Constitución como reacción a la censura del apartheid, pero esa libertad sigue estando en peligro constante

Desde la India

“¿Qué tiene que hacer un periodista joven y con principios para sobrevivir?”

Bhanuj Kappal se muestra preocupado por la erosión de la integridad editorial de la India a manos de los propietarios de los medios de comunicación y las presiones que sufren los periodistas para acatar órdenes

Los periodistas de la India se sienten cada vez más aislados y asediados por los líderes políticos, el Gobierno, las hordas de trolls partisanos que plagan las secciones de comentarios de internet y las redes sociales, y hasta por las mismas empresas que los emplean.

Según la web de noticias Scroll.in, la subeditora de CNN-IBN, Sagarika Ghose, habría recibido instrucciones desde la dirección de su empresa matriz, Network 18, de no publicar tuits desdeñosos sobre el actual primer ministro indio, Narendra Modi. Ghose se negó a confirmar o desmentir el asunto al reportero de Scroll.in, pero sí declaró estar presenciando una tendencia preocupante hacia una celebración del partidismo mientras que «a los periodistas que ven al político como su adversario natural y lo cuestionan sistemáticamente se los culpa de parcialidad». Al tiempo de aquello, renunció.

Todo esto plantea una imagen bastante alarmante para los jóvenes periodistas como yo, según la cual los propietarios y directores de los medios de comunicación estarían desmantelando las ideas de independencia e integridad editorial. Y eso sin contar todos los artículos inéditos sobre acuerdos editoriales y prácticas poco éticas que salen en la conversación cada vez que los periodistas jóvenes se juntan para tomar algo.

Uno de mis antiguos compañeros de clase de la facultad de periodismo está tan desencantado con su experiencia en un popular canal indio de noticias en inglés que ha decidido abandonar el periodismo televisivo y pasarse a la prensa escrita.

«Publican antes un reportaje visual que uno de interés público», me contó. Otro, que trabajaba en una destacada revista en papel, ha decidido abandonar el periodismo del todo y volver al mundo académico. Como apuntaba en un editorial Hartosh Singh Bal, el editor político al que Open Magazine despidió hace poco, «Los periodistas que se incorporan a la profesión hoy en día, al haber sido despojados en gran medida del escudo protector de un buen editor, se ven obligados a hacer concesiones de cara a superiores y propietarios en una fase mucho más temprana de sus carreras».

Todo esto sume a los jóvenes periodistas en un dilema. ¿Te quedarías en una organización en la que peligra la independencia editorial? En plena sequía de empleos y con una escasez de medios de comunicación de fiar, ¿cómo puede sobrevivir un joven periodista al tiempo que mantiene su compromiso con el periodismo independiente y ético? Lo que es más importante: ¿qué pasa con el ideal del periodismo libre y crítico cuando se les está enseñando a los jóvenes periodistas, por medio de ejemplos en la vida pública, que el periodista defensor a ultranza de sus principios es el que se convierte rápidamente en un periodista en el paro?

Todas estas son preguntas importantes para el futuro del periodismo en un país en el que los medios se están transformando en algunos de los peores enemigos del debate público. A los jóvenes reporteros poco más les queda que mirar con desánimo cómo la generación que ya se ha labrado un nombre (y asegurado la jubilación) arrastran la profesión, y su futuro, por el barro. Entre eso y las dificultades tecnológicas y económicas a las que se enfrenta el periodismo hoy día a nivel global —la “streamificación” de las noticias, el “churnalism” o periodismo de copia-pega, la reducción del periodismo cultural a “contenido” o “listículos”—, me cuesta culpar a mi amigo por elegir la relativa seguridad de una carrera académica. El futuro es deprimente.

Pero los periodistas jóvenes no están totalmente indefensos. La respuesta de muchos de nosotros ha sido hacernos autónomos, renunciando a la seguridad económica a cambio de la libertad de elegir las historias que queremos contar y mantenernos fieles a nuestros principios éticos. Otros eligen trabajar en organizaciones informativas muy especializadas, pero independientes. Estamos formando redes informales de apoyo y compartiendo información, tanto en internet como en la vida real, guiándonos por el principio de que hacer llegar una historia a la gente es más importante que conseguir firmar en ciertos sitios o llevarse el mérito de una exclusiva.

Y por cada clon de Buzzfeed que surge, internet ofrece otros espacios en los que los temas que ignoran los medios mayoritarios reciben la atención y el análisis que se merecen. Webs como Scroll.in o Yahoo! Originals están dándoles a los jóvenes periodistas autónomos la oportunidad de crear el tipo de periodismo original e independiente que ha dejado de interesar a los medios tradicionales. Está todo en pañales y no es perfecto, pero es la única esperanza que nos queda de conseguir un periodismo indio que no se lo deba todo a intereses corporativos y políticos.

(c) Bhanuj Kappal

www.indexoncensorship.org

Bhanuj Kappal es un periodista independiente de 26 años afincado en Bombay. Es colaborador de varios medios, como el Sunday Guardian, Yahoo! India y QG India. Tiene un máster en periodismo internacional por la facultad de periodismo, medios de comunicación y estudios culturales de la Universidad de Cardiff.

Traducción de Arrate Hidalgo Sánchez

La generación que ya se ha labrado un nombre y asegurado la jubilación arrastran la profesión, y nuestro futuro, por el barro

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

SUPPORT INDEX'S WORK