25 Jun 2012 | Leveson Inquiry
Lord Justice Leveson has stressed there is no “hidden agenda” to his Inquiry into press standards.
In opening remarks to this morning’s session — which were posted on the Inquiry website — Leveson said he understood “only too well” journalists’ anxieties over the “dangers of a knee-jerk response” to the phone-hacking scandal that erupted last summer, but added that “no recommendations have been formulated or written; no conclusions have yet been reached.”
Leveson was making his first public response to a Mail on Sunday story on 17 June that alleged the judge had threatened to quit over comments education secretary Michael Gove had made to Parliament in February, in which he suggested a “chilling effect” was emanating from the Inquiry.
Leveson said he did contact cabinet secretary Jeremy Heywood following Gove’s comments to clarify whether the government still supported the Inquiry.
“I wanted to find out whether Mr Gove was speaking for the government, whether it was thought that the very existence of the Inquiry was having a chilling effect on healthy, vibrant journalism and whether the government had effectively reached a settled view on any potential recommendations,” Leveson said. “Put shortly, I was concerned about the perception that the Inquiry was being undermined while it was taking place.”
The judge said it was “absolutely correct” for the press to hold the Inquiry and himself to account, but added it was “at least arguable that what has happened is an example of an approach which seeks to convert any attempt to question the conduct of the press as an attack on free speech.”
Simon Walters, the article’s co-author, appeared at the Inquiry this afternoon. He was not quizzed over the story, having been called to give evidence before it was printed.
The Inquiry continues tomorrow.
Follow Index on Censorship’s coverage of the Leveson Inquiry on Twitter – @IndexLeveson
12 Jun 2012 | Campaigns, News and features, United Kingdom
After the success of the Libel Reform Campaign, the UK government’s Defamation bill will be debated in parliament today
(more…)
28 May 2012 | Azerbaijan News, Europe and Central Asia, News and features
The landslide winner of the Eurovision Song Contest, Sweden’s Loreen, has thwarted Azerbaijan’s attempts to use the competition to whitewash its record on free speech.
Prior to the competition, the Euphoria singer had met Azerbaijani activists, and was quoted as saying: “Human rights are violated in Azerbaijan every day. One should not be silent about such things.”
On the night of the Eurovision final, there was huge support for Index’s petition on Azerbaijan with tweets from Stephen Fry, Graham Linehan, Owen Jones and Caitlin Moran and political support from Lord Ken MacDonald QC, Icelandic MP Birgitta Jonsdottir and MEPs Edward McMillan-Scott, Richard Howitt, Nessa Childers and David Martin.
The petition is just short of 4000 signatures – if you haven’t signed it – please sign now: Azerbaijanpetition.org
25 May 2012 | Uncategorized
In a talk at Chatham House in London today, Libya’s interim Prime Minister Abdurrahim El-Kib talked about “re-establishing the state” in Libya after 42 years of Gaddafi’s brutal rule and about the path towards elections due next month. He said the interim government is “committeed to enhancing respect for human rights”.
Challenged on Law 37, passed at the start of May, which restricts freedom of speech, El-Kib defended the law as necessary during a time of transition when there is still what he called “a tremendous effort to destabilise the country”. He went on to say that “there are many who are trying to get us to a point where we cannot even hold the election.”
Law 37 prohibits “damaging” the 17 February revolution and also criminalises any insults to Islam, or the “prestige of the state or its institutions or judiciary, and every person who publicly insults the Libyan people, slogan or flag”. This law clearly undermines the right to free expression and risks undermining Libya’s transition to democracy since any free election must be based on open debate and respect for rights.
Prime Minister El-Kib said: “Once we get to elections and a general assembly is formed, I guarantee that such laws will disappear.” This however will depend in future on the national assembly and not on the current interim Prime Minister and so there are no guarantees unless the law is repealed now.
Asked by Index about freedom of the press and of civil society, El-Kib said the media are flourishing in Libya and that he fully supports press freedom and an active civil society: “We encourage civil society, we meet with them, we participate in their events if we are invited.”
He also expressed his conviction that once elected the national assembly will guarantee human rights and freedom of the press when the new constitution is drawn up: “These reflect a set of values that caused the revolution, so you cannot ever think this is something we want to compromise.”
Until Law 37 is repealed, these positive sentiments will not reflect or presage a new Libya that fully respects human rights.
