Google’s announcement that its can no longer ignore free speech concerns in China puts other technology companies in the spotlight says Cynthia Wong
(more…)
Index on Censorship today welcomed Google’s announcement that it will no longer co-operate with the Chinese government’s censorship of google.cn, the company’s Chinese search engine
(more…)
Google has announced it will stop censoring search results in China after discovering that hackers have been targeting the company’s Gmail system in order to access the email accounts of Chinese human rights campaigners.
The company revealed its new approach to China in a post on the company’s blog last night. It claims that while investigating a series of sophisticated cyber attacks “we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of US-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third party”
The company whose “don’t be evil” motto was called into question by their 2006 decision to censor local results in order to run a limited China-based search engine. Google claim they launched Google.cn “in the belief that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results.”
However, in the face of sophisticated cyber attacks and the Chinese government’s increasing efforts to limit free speech on the web Google have announced that unless they are able to run an unfiltered search operation they will consider pulling out of their Chinese operations.
This is a guest post by Judith Townend
It doesn’t sound likely but it’s true: Google is helping restrict access to free content.
Rupert Murdoch has flexed some muscle and forced a small concession by Google, it would seem.
Following the News Corp CEO’s threats to remove news content from Google’s search index and Google News, Google has updated its “First-Click-Free” system allowing publishers to restrict users’ free access to their sites.
Under the system, publishers who run closed content models — those Google calls “premium content providers” — can still be a part of Google News without releasing their content in full.
It was designed to allow users to access a news item via Google once — but of course, users could do this for lots of articles each day. Now, they will be limited to five items per day.
The publishers want to be part of Google, but they don’t want to disincentivise users from paying subscriptions and/or registering on the site.
Now, it looks like the closed content publishers can have their cake and eat it too, for the time being at least: Google senior business product manager Josh Cohen announced yesterday that publishers could charge for their content and still make it available via Google with the updated system. “The two aren’t mutually exclusive,” he explained in a blog post.
But at the end of the day, it’s a small move: Google still holds the power in this search relationship. Murdoch and the other big publishers want its juice. And they know it. Why else spend so much time attacking it?
Note this little reminder in Cohen’s piece:
“Paid content may not do as well as free options, but that is not a decision we make based on whether or not it’s free. It’s simply based on the popularity of the content with users and other sites that link to it.”
And Murdoch’s bound to be even angrier about this: a Fair Syndication Consortium study in the US [PDF at this link] has revealed that Google accounted for 53 per cent of ad revenue attracted by “unlicensed” online news content.
He’ll be uneasy about the concessionary crumbs thrown down to him, well aware that the Google cake isn’t as good as it first looks. One loophole might have been closed, but it’s not goodbye to free and open access news content just yet.
Judith Townend is senior reporter for journalism.co.uk.
twitter.com/journalismnews